|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 91-94
Direct colony polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification of yeasts isolated from blood specimen
Rajyoganandh S Vijayaraman, Vijayakumar Ramaraj, Anupma J Kindo
Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Web Publication||30-Nov-2016|
Anupma J Kindo
Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Context: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by yeasts have an increasing frequency due to the growing population of immunosuppressed individuals. Among yeasts, Candida remains the most prevalent species with the increase in the incidence of non-albicans Candida species. Apart from Candida, other yeasts are also involved in causing BSI. High mortality associated with Candida and other yeast infection can be reduced by prompt and appropriate antifungal therapy. Hence, rapid identification and speciation of yeasts isolated from blood play a significant role in the management of the patients. Since conventional methods used for speciation of Candida and other yeasts are laborious, time-consuming and often unclear, rapid and accurate molecular techniques are required. Materials and Methods: Instead of using purified genomic DNA as template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we used yeast colony and cell suspensions in water and 0.10M potassium hydroxide as template for PCR. Candida albicans, Trichosporon and Cryptococcus neoformans were used as reference strains. Further, a total of 100 yeast isolates were also tested. All reactions were performed using the universal fungal primers ITS1 and ITS4; the PCR products were then digested with restriction enzyme (Msp1). Results: Direct colony PCR (DCPCR) produced sharp and distinct bands compared to the cell suspensions with the reference strains. All the 100 clinical isolates tested also produced distinct bands. Conclusion: DCPCR approach not only reduces the DNA template preparation time but is also easy, rapid and reduces the cost of PCR.
Keywords: Candidemia, direct colony polymerase chain reaction, non-albicans Candida, restriction fragment length polymorphism
|How to cite this article:|
Vijayaraman RS, Ramaraj V, Kindo AJ. Direct colony polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification of yeasts isolated from blood specimen. J Acad Clin Microbiol 2016;18:91-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Vijayaraman RS, Ramaraj V, Kindo AJ. Direct colony polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification of yeasts isolated from blood specimen. J Acad Clin Microbiol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 24];18:91-4. Available from: http://www.jacmjournal.org/text.asp?2016/18/2/91/194928
| Introduction|| |
Yeast infections, candidiasis, in particular, are a cause of increasing mortality and morbidity in immunocompromised patients. They cause a wide range of clinical conditions in humans ranging from mild superficial infections to severe invasive disease. For therapeutic, prognostic and epidemiological reasons, it is necessary to accurately identify the etiological agent. The conventional methods of identification have low sensitivity, specificity and take three or more days. Nowadays, nucleic acid-based detection methods are widely being used for identification of yeast infections, of which polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely used and has high sensitivity, specificity and is simple to perform.
Like other nucleic acid-based techniques, PCR also requires purified DNA. Numerous methods are available for the purification of DNA, from indigenous to commercial methods. The conventional methods include enzymatic method, bead beating and using chaotropic agents. These methods are time-consuming, laborious, use toxic chemicals such as Phenol and Chloroform and might release low-quality DNA. The available commercial kits are expensive and not affordable by all laboratories.
Colony PCR is a technique where the DNA extraction step is omitted, and the yeast cells are directly suspended into the PCR reaction mix and used for amplification. In this study, we evaluated colony PCR, in identifying important yeasts such as Candida, Cryptococcus and Trichosporon. In addition, a significant number of clinical isolates were tested for the efficiency of the technique.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was carried out in the Mycology Division, Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, for one year from July 2013 to June 2014. Blood specimen positive for yeast growth was taken into the study. The 100 yeast isolates obtained during this period was used in the study.
Candida albicans ATCC 90028, Trichosporon asahii MTCC 6179 and Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolate, which were confirmed by gene sequencing, were used as reference organisms to access the proficiency of colony PCR in this study.
Preliminary identification of clinical isolates
All the 100 clinical isolates obtained during the one-year duration were identified using automated culture identification system, Vitek2 (BioMerieux, USA). All these isolates were subjected to colony PCR after standardisation with reference organisms.
Colony polymerase chain reaction
Preparation of DNA for colony polymerase chain reaction
Three different approaches were used to prepare DNA for colony PCR. First, cell suspension was prepared by suspending a loopful of culture in 1 ml sterile distilled water. Second, a loopful of culture was suspended in 1 ml of 0.10M potassium hydroxide (KOH). Both these suspensions were boiled for 1 min to lyse the cell wall and release the genomic DNA. This crude DNA served as the template for PCR. Third, the yeast cells directly from Sabouraud's dextrose agar plate were used as template.
Polymerase chain reaction
Direct colony PCR (DCPCR) was performed in a total reaction volume of 50 μl containing 25 μl of 2× PCR master mix (GeNei, Bengaluru, India), 50 pmol ITS 1 (5'-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3') and 50 pmol ITS 4 (5'-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3') (Sigma-Aldrich). To the reaction mix, 1, 2 and 5 μl of both water and KOH cell suspensions were added in corresponding tubes. In one tube, a speck of an isolated colony was suspended into the PCR reaction mix with a sterile micropipette tip. These served as the template. The volume was made up to 50 μl using nuclease-free water. In all PCR runs, positive and negative controls were included in the study. PCR reaction mix without culture was used as negative control, and DNA extracted from C. albicans ATCC 90028 was used as positive control.
The amplification parameters consisted of 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 1 min. An initial denaturation of 94°C for 10 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min were also included in the study.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Restriction enzyme digestion was done for all the PCR products. The reaction mix contained 0.5 μl (10U) Msp1 enzyme (New England Biolabs, England), 2 μl of restriction buffer 4 (New England Biolabs, England) and 10 μl of amplicon obtained from DCPCR using ITS 1 and ITS 4 primers. The reaction volume was made up to 20 μl using nuclease-free water. The reaction mix was incubated at 37°C for 1 h.,
Ten microlitres of the PCR product and RFLP product were electrophoresed in 1.5% and 2% agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer, respectively, stained with ethidium bromide (10 mg/ml) and visualised under ultraviolet illumination.
On standardisation of with the reference strains, the technique was further extended and tested on 100 clinical yeast isolates.
| Results|| |
The study was conducted from July 2013 to June 2014. One hundred yeast isolates obtained during this period were used in this study. Out of the 100 isolates, 29 were C. albicans, 57 were Candida tropicalis, 12 were Candida parapsilosis and 1 Candida krusei and Candida glabrata. There was no difference between the identification of isolates by Vitek2 and PCR-RFLP.
All the reference strains tested produced amplicons for the PAN fungal primers, ITS 1 and ITS 4. No false positive or false negative results were observed.
Amplicons were present in all the different volumes of cell lysates used. However, the amplicons produced by water suspension and direct colony were intense compared to the bands produced by KOH suspension. Among the various volumes of cell lysate added, 2 μl produced distinct and bright bands than 1 and 5 μl cell suspension [Figure 1]. The addition of direct colony also produced bright and distinct bands compared to other cell suspensions. This DCPCR was tested in 100 clinical isolates.
|Figure 1: Polymerase chain reaction results of potassium hydroxide, water extract and direct suspension. Lane M -100 bp ladder; Lanes 1-3 -1, 2, 5 μl potassium hydroxide extract; Lanes 4-6 -1, 2, 5 μl water extract; Lane 7 -Direct suspension|
Click here to view
DCPCR produced amplicons with PAN fungal primers for all the 100 clinical isolates tested. A single band was seen for all the 100 isolates of which, 81 bands were sharp and 19 were faint bands, but still clear and visible. The PCR bands were of different sizes ranging from 350 to 850 bp approximately [Figure 2], and the RFLP banding pattern differed depending on the yeast species [Figure 3]. PCR-RFLP was able to identify five medically important Candida species. The different species obtained by PCR-RFLP are listed above.
|Figure 2: Direct colony polymerase chain reaction of representative species isolated. Lane M -100 bp DNA marker; Lane 1 -Candida albicans; Lane 2 -Candida tropicalis; Lane 3 -Candida parapsilosis; Lane 4 -Candida glabrata; Lane 5 -Candida krusei; Lane 6 -Unidentified species|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern of representative species isolated. Lane M -100 bp DNA marker; Lane 1 -Candida albicans; Lane 2 -Candida tropicalis; Lane 3 -Candida parapsilosis; Lane 4 -Candida glabrata; Lane 5 -Candida krusei; Lane 6 - Unidentified species|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Early and rapid identification of invasive yeast infections is hindered by the lack of sensitive and specific assays. Although techniques are available for rapid nucleic acid amplification and identification, the extraction and purification of DNA still remains a problem in developing countries like India, requiring time, high cost and workforce. Here, we studied a simple, rapid and sensitive method to amplify DNA directly from yeast cells. Among the three DNA preparations tested, the addition of colony directly to the PCR reaction mix produced better results than the water suspension and KOH suspension. This even simplifies the method, as there will be no need of preparation of cell suspensions. DCPCR was applicable to three different yeasts which were tested and could be applied for all clinical isolates, as most of the bloodstream infections are caused by Candida, Cryptococcus and Trichosporon only. Furthermore, the technique was rapid and took only 4-6 h, whereas Vitek2 took a minimum of two days. In addition, the technique showed 100% efficiency when tested with clinical isolates with no false positive or false negative reactions. Although the omission of DNA extraction procedure compromised the availability of large amount of DNA, there was sufficient DNA available for the PCR reaction to produce positive results. This could be due to the fact that numerous cells were used in the reaction and each cell harbours multiple copies of the targeted RDNA gene (50-100 copies/cell). RFLP analysis was done to check whether the cell debris from the PCR reaction inhibited the RFLP reaction. The RFLP bands were as clear and intense as the PCR bands showing that the cell debris in the PCR reaction mix did not interfere with the RFLP as well.
Earlier, Lau et al. and Mirhendi et al. have shown that colony PCR would be a rapid and convenient method for amplification of yeast DNA. The method is less time intensive and additional steps are not required; further, it might serve as an alternative to the conventional DNA extraction procedure.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
González de Molina FJ, Leön C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P; CAVA I Study Group. Assessment of candidemia-attributable mortality in critically ill patients using propensity score matching analysis. Crit Care 2012;16:R105.
Dismukes WE, Pappas PG, Sobel JD. Clinical Mycology. 2003.
Hinrikson HP, Hurst SF, Lott TJ, Warnock DW, Morrison CJ. Assessment of ribosomal large-subunit D1-D2, internal transcribed spacer 1, and internal transcribed spacer 2 regions as targets for molecular identification of medically important Aspergillus
species. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:2092-103.
Wellinghausen N, Siegel D, Winter J, Gebert S. Rapid diagnosis of candidaemia by real-time PCR detection of Candida
DNA in blood samples. J Med Microbiol 2009;58(Pt 8):1106-11.
Alshahni MM, Makimura K, Yamada T, Satoh K, Ishihara Y, Takatori K, et al.
Direct colony PCR of several medically important fungi using Ampdirect plus. Jpn J Infect Dis 2009;62:164-7.
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning. Vol. 2. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Harvard; 1989.
Mirhendi HK, Rezaei DA, Jalalizand N, Hosseinpur L, Khodadadi H. Colony-PCR is a rapid and sensitive method for DNA amplification in yeasts. Iran J Public Health 2007;36:40-4.
Vijayakumar R, Giri S, Kindo AJ. Molecular species identification of Candida
from blood samples of intensive care unit patients by polymerase chain reaction - Restricted fragment length polymorphism. J Lab Physicians 2012;4:1-4.
Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Khoramizadeh M, Yamaguchi H. A one-enzyme PCR-RFLP assay for identification of six medically important Candida
species. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2006;47:225-9.
Lau A, Chen S, Sorrell T, Carter D, Malik R, Martin P, et al.
Development and clinical application of a panfungal PCR assay to detect and identify fungal DNA in tissue specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:380-5.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]